Following on from yesterday's post on Racing Tipsters, one of the motivations for setting up Peerless Racing is to expose the level of misleading advertising which has a negative impact on the betting industry. Listing recent winners is a common ploy, but is totally meaningless when it comes to assessing the profitability of following the recommended advice.
Advised prices are all well and good, but when those prices are nigh on impossible for most people to obtain then it is hardly a fair way to ask people to judge you.
It is also a fact that it is not possible to obtain independently verified profit and loss information on tipsters from the Racing Post, who their advertisers claim to have proofed their selections to. If this surprises you, just email the Racing Post Editor, Bruce Millington, and ask him why he does not provide overall records for all of the tipsters who appear in his paper. The only ones you hear about are the ones who actually make a profit. Fair play to Tom Segal, Kevin Pullein, and others who will consistently make you a long term profit if you can obtain the prices they advise. But Richard Birch, Tony Cascarino, and the many others who are given column inches every week? Where are their profit and loss records, Mr. Millington?
No comments:
Post a Comment